We found some very interesting things today with a little patience and research. As you saw a few moments ago, we pointed out the fact that Fairfield City Schools had yet to post the 2016 meeting schedule for the Board of Education. We have since found a few other inconsistencies on the district's web page as it relates to Board of Education meetings that could lead some people to believe Fairfield is dangerously close to running afoul of Ohio's Public Meetings law.
We'll provide links below to everything we're citing here.
First, we'll reference Ohio Revised Code 121.22; the Public meetings law. Among other things, the law states in Section C:
"The minutes of a regular or special meeting of any public body shall be promptly prepared, filed, and maintained and shall be open to public inspection. The minutes need only reflect the general subject matter of discussions in executive sessions authorized under division (G) or (J) of this section."
We direct your attention to the meeting minutes portion of the Fairfield City School District website. We would like to point out a few inconsistencies.
Firstly, as you can see, the meeting minutes for the October 15th Board of Education meeting have not been posted on the district's website. Why not? We notified Fairfield spokesperson Gina Gentry-Fletcher of the absence of the minutes from the district website on October 21st, 2015. As you can see from the e-mail exchange below, we were assured the meeting minutes would eventually be posted:
Firstly, as you can see, the meeting minutes for the October 15th Board of Education meeting have not been posted on the district's website. Why not? We notified Fairfield spokesperson Gina Gentry-Fletcher of the absence of the minutes from the district website on October 21st, 2015. As you can see from the e-mail exchange below, we were assured the meeting minutes would eventually be posted:
So why are we here on January 25th, 2016, and the minutes from the October 15th, 2015 Board of Education meeting are not posted on the district's website? It is a legitimate question. So where are the minutes?
We're certain the absence of the meeting minutes from October 15th has absolutely nothing to do with the large, vocal crowd that attended that evening's Board meeting. You can read more here about the 150+ people showed up to demand action, change, accountability, and transparency about the horrible bullying problems in Fairfield City Schools. You can watch the video of the numerous brave speakers who turned out that night to condemn the district's pitiful handling of bullying:
We have also found some inconsistencies with several of the Board meeting minutes that were actually posted from 2015. For some of last year's Board meetings, when speakers chose to address the Board during open communication time, the individual citizens and the topics they spoke on were identified specifically. You can see this in the March 19th, 2015, July 13, 2015, and May 21, 2015 Board meeting minutes. Please feel free to click on the meeting minutes for the dates we're citing on the district's page.
Yet, for the Board meeting minutes from November 19th and December 17th, where many speakers chose to address the Board about bullying, the individual speakers and the topic of their respective remarks are not identified. Why? What changed?
More importantly, no mention was made of the concerns citizens brought before the Board of Education at the December 17th meeting regarding the inappropriate playing of the song "Another One Bites the Dust," in regards to a staff meeting at Fairfield Middle School, where a topic discussed was Emilie Olsen's memorial vigil. You can watch a video of concerned citizens mentioning this incident here:
Yet these remarks - made in a lawful, open public meeting - did not get mentioned specifically in the Board of Education meeting minutes for December 17th, 2015. Why not?
A cynical person, suspicious of the district's motives, might well conclude that it is trying to conceal the true revulsion and ire the community has expressed for the way Fairfield City Schools has conducted itself in the months since Emilie Olsen's tragic loss. You're free to think whatever you like. The only things we know are that Ohio law calls for a transparent communication of minutes for lawful public meetings, and the district has yet to post those records for October 15th, 2015 on it's website, where most of those records are generally posted and available to the public.
There may be very plausible, reasonable explanations for why the Board meeting minutes for October 15tth, 2015 have yet to be posted. There may be perfectly reasonable answers for the vague summaries in the minutes as it relates to the public comments portion of the last few Board of Education meetings. If so, we would welcome clarification from Fairfield City Schools.
Section F of the Ohio meetings law states:
" Every public body, by rule, shall establish a reasonable method whereby any person may determine the time and place of all regularly scheduled meetings and the time, place, and purpose of all special meetings."
The most widely used method that Fairfield City Schools has established for communicating the time and place of Board of Education meetings appears to be the district's website. If this is a misunderstanding on our part, then we apologize, and would be interested to know what the primary method for communicating the meeting schedule is.
Section I of the Ohio meetings law states, in part:
"(1) Any person may bring an action to enforce this section. An action under division (I)(1) of this section shall be brought within two years after the date of the alleged violation or threatened violation. Upon proof of a violation or threatened violation of this section in an action brought by any person, the court of common pleas shall issue an injunction to compel the members of the public body to comply with its provisions. (2)
(a) If the court of common pleas issues an injunction pursuant to division (I)(1) of this section, the court shall order the public body that it enjoins to pay a civil forfeiture of five hundred dollars to the party that sought the injunction and shall award to that party all court costs and, subject to reduction as described in division (I)(2) of this section, reasonable attorney's fees."
Section I of the Ohio meetings law states, in part:
"(1) Any person may bring an action to enforce this section. An action under division (I)(1) of this section shall be brought within two years after the date of the alleged violation or threatened violation. Upon proof of a violation or threatened violation of this section in an action brought by any person, the court of common pleas shall issue an injunction to compel the members of the public body to comply with its provisions. (2)
(a) If the court of common pleas issues an injunction pursuant to division (I)(1) of this section, the court shall order the public body that it enjoins to pay a civil forfeiture of five hundred dollars to the party that sought the injunction and shall award to that party all court costs and, subject to reduction as described in division (I)(2) of this section, reasonable attorney's fees."
We would hate for it come to pursuing legal action to get the district to publish the Board of Education's meeting schedule for 2016, or the meeting minutes for October 15th, 2015, in it's usual location on the district website. We certainly do not have the time and resources for all that. Someone else may have the time to go to court to get that accomplished however. But we do not, and would not encourage anyone to do so, even though a lawyer or judge might find all this very interesting indeed.
As usual, by not simply doing the right thing all along as they should have, Fairfield City Schools once more find itself as the object of suspicion. Fairfield City Schools finds itself once more acting much like an organization with something to hide.
For the record, we don't actually think the district broke the law here. We actually don't even believe Fairfield City Schools is up to no good in this instance. We believe the absence of the October 15th Board meeting minutes is probably an accident. However, the law states that the public meeting minutes need to be available, and those for the October 15th, 2015 session are not posted where one would generally locate such records. The district needs to clarify or remedy this situation.
By virtue of the way Fairfield City Schools has conducted itself with the community for years, and particularly in the horrible way it has handled the Emilie Olsen tragedy, the district has lost the benefit of the doubt with the public. The district's misconduct and actions of thoroughly bad faith this past year or so have forced everything Fairfield City Schools does under the microscope of skepticism and doubt. The district has only itself to thank for that. We will eagerly await their explanation about these inconsistencies regarding public meetings and minutes documentation with an open mind.
For the record, we don't actually think the district broke the law here. We actually don't even believe Fairfield City Schools is up to no good in this instance. We believe the absence of the October 15th Board meeting minutes is probably an accident. However, the law states that the public meeting minutes need to be available, and those for the October 15th, 2015 session are not posted where one would generally locate such records. The district needs to clarify or remedy this situation.
By virtue of the way Fairfield City Schools has conducted itself with the community for years, and particularly in the horrible way it has handled the Emilie Olsen tragedy, the district has lost the benefit of the doubt with the public. The district's misconduct and actions of thoroughly bad faith this past year or so have forced everything Fairfield City Schools does under the microscope of skepticism and doubt. The district has only itself to thank for that. We will eagerly await their explanation about these inconsistencies regarding public meetings and minutes documentation with an open mind.
You must maintain vigilance and watch your local school district carefully. Not just Fairfield City Schools. All districts must be accountable to a public that is ever mindful of what is going on in their schools. You also have a duty to be reasonable and understanding for the challenges faced by our educators today.